Questions For Georgina Bruni Concerning
The Book "You Can’t Tell The People"
© Copyright Larry Warren

Since the November 2000, publication of Ms Bruni’s book, I’ve been asked by many interested parties for a reaction to the claims the author, Bruni, makes with regard to both myself and the Bentwaters/Woodbridge UFO incident or Rendlesham Forest as it is known in Britain.

The author Bruni, did in fact send me a complementary copy of her book as she had promised she would, and after three careful reads of it, I found that I had some very serious issues with either the authors research methods, her ethics, her general truthfulness, and lastly, Ms Bruni’s claim that her book is both the "True" and "Definitive" account of the very complex Bentwaters case. Initially, I had noted over one hundred and ninety seven problems with here "definitive" account, soon that number rose to a staggering 407 problems some of course, more major than others, but just the same, these problems exist and must be addressed.

I can assure you, this will be an interesting insight into the "agenda driven" UFO researchers out there; and the UFO community can draw there own conclusions on just what agendas drove Ms Bruni "to write" and "not write" what she did in "You Can’t Tell The People"

Back in December 2000, Ms Bruni was told that I had 197 issues with her book - she wrote to the Hull based UFO researcher, Sean Tierney, that I could not have "10" issues, let alone 197 issues with her "factual" research on Bentwaters.

She made this claim via the Internet and added some rather insulting commentary as well.

Ms Bruni has avoided a few invitations to debate these problems in a public forum with me, (She was very busy), and seems more comfortable with spin and distortion, mixed with a heavy dose of hype, in her bizarre online battles with veteran Bentwaters researcher, Jenny Randles. That fight has been conducted on "UFO Updates Mailing List!" UFO Updates List

Lastly, on that matter, Jenny Randles made a complete fool of the author Bruni, who's response to Jenny looked a bit self deluded and desperate, in my opinion of course, but Bruni did little to establish herself as an "investigative journalist" and showed a complete lack of professionalism.

Ms Bruni has made the task at hand a bit simpler for me by claiming that I could not put 10 questions to her with regard to her "excellent research!"

So Ms Bruni, here are twenty questions concerning your "definitive" book "You Can’t Tell The People!" (Let’s start with easy ones!)

Q#1 - Ms Bruni, Why does the fact that you edit an online "Gossip Magazine" entitled "Hot Gossip" not mentioned in the text of your book? Sure, your dust jacket states that you edit an "on-line magazine", but again I ask you, why is the keyword "Gossip" omitted from the jacket text, I mean, it is true right?

Q#2 - Ms Bruni, Did you read the book, "Left At East Gate"? If so, as a researcher "Trained In Investigation", did you note the on "Record interviews" with other witnesses circa 1984 and published in East Gate, and then compared the statements from that time with the alleged statements given to you during the course of your "Definitive Research" by those same individuals?

Q#3 - Ms Bruni, On page 29, 2nd paragraph of the chapter, you title "American Pie", you write, "Both police squadrons carried weapons such as the M-16, and a weapon capable of shooting down a helicopter" end quote, my question is this, you claim to have interviewed numerous witnesses from 81st SPS cir 1980, myself included. You claim to be a trained investigative journalist as well, that said, in 1980 the 81st Security Police - was in fact made up of two separate disciplines. Law Enforcement Police carried a Colt 38, 6 shot revolver, a night stick, a Motorola 4 band radio and handcuffs. L.E. Did not carry an M-16 rifle, as you write in your book.

Security Specialist - (Me) carried these weapons depending on assignment.

A Colt M-16 Rifle that fired 7.6 NATO Rounds.

A Colt G.U.A. Short Stock 16 - Same NATO Rounds.

An M-60 - Heavy Cal, Sub Machine Gun.

An M-203 - Combo 16/203 Mil, Grenade Launcher - (note, a surface to surface weapon)

Handcuffs and a Motorola 4Ch Radio

My point is simple - you are claiming in your "Factual Book" that we were armed with "surface to air" weapons - as you now know, this is not true - Whom told you this "fact?" Who told you that L.E. Carried M-16’s?

As an investigative journalist did you do any background research on the security police and the jobs role in Europe circa 1980?

Did you contact the USAF Security police Museum in San Antonio, Texas?

One would think you would as it was Security Police whom are your primary witnesses to the UFO incident! Or as you like to say, was this information something you were told or something you knew?

Q#4 - Ms Bruni, In the current issue of UFO Magazine (UK), I notice on the top of page 13 - the banner headline "MOD Warned America About UFO Book!" This refers only to the point that the MOD sent a rather bland memo to USAFE Mildenhall, Norfolk (Likely to public affairs) informing USAF to expect queries concerning your book - Of course this happened as far back as 1984 with the book "Skycrash" except at that time, memos of this nature would have gone to Bentwaters Public Affairs, Mildenhall is now the administrative centre for the USAF in Britain. I see nothing strange with this. So I ask you, is the banner headline simply hype and more creative marketing?

Or do you really believe that you are the only person to publish a book on the case? And that America was really "warned" about your book? Books on this subject are NOT reviewed by the government before being published in America, as we have freedom of speech and expression.

Q#5 - Ms Bruni, Is your book available in book stores in America?

Q#6 - Ms Bruni, of course you have shown the lighthouse theory to be the joke it always was - you are not the first to do so. Why did you not choose to vent some of your spite at the idiots (Like Easton and Ridpath, etc.) Who promote the lighthouse theory, instead of on some of the witnesses to the incident.

Did you ever visit the forest at night?

Or for that matter, Did you ever visit Caple Green?

As a trained investigator, I’d have thought you would have addressed the debunkers by name and theory and then laid waste to them with your "Definitive Research"? Ignoring them is not balanced research is it?

Q#7 - Ms Bruni, On page 33 in the New UFO Magazine, we see you have been invited to speak at the 20th Leeds UFO Conference in September - I can tell you that I’m sure you will enjoy it! Baring another petrol strike.

I notice that in your brief bio, you are identified as being a "Best Selling Author" Congratulations!!! That’s super. Peter and myself were in the British Top 10 Best Sellers List in the summer of 1997, in fact two lists. (In Britain, one must sell over 5,000 Hard Back copies of ones book without returns, to get there!)

Could you let me know on what list your book has qualified as a "Best Seller" or is the claim more hype and creative marketing?

It is hard work to get a true best seller (A major book tour can help), but UFO books are not doing well these days and it would be insulting to authors that are Best Selling authors, to have authors who are not, saying that they are! What do you say? (In your defence, John Mack is NOT a "Former" Pulitzer Prize Winner, he is one!)

Q#8 - Ms Bruni, In your book you state that I "more than once contemplated suicide" Based on what source do you conclude this?

First it is bullshit, second, it is legally actionable, and third, - Did you read East Gate?

Had you done so, why did you not report accurately what happened to me 14 years ago and why?

Why was it necessary to write this inaccurate and slanderous statement at all? Please don’t tell me that I told you that! Because I will then ask you to produce the audio tape of me doing so, OK! So please answer why you tried to create such an inaccurate and unstable picture of Larry Warren?

In fact, you put more effort into slandering me then resolving the case, Why?

Q#9 - Ms Bruni, During our 5 or 6 telephone conversations from March 1999 to the late Spring of 2000, you often asked me if I was recording you? You also stated more than once that you NEVER recorded your interviews! In the State Of Vermont, one can record any telephone call without.

The other party knowing it, for legal purposes and for the record. When we did speak, I was living in Vermont, and I did in fact record all of your phone calls, (For legal purposes) as it was my right to do so. However you eventually told my wife that you reordered all of your conversations and did not admit as much to the people you spoke too. "As A Professional Trained Researcher", Why did not have the professional courtesy to ask for permission to record your "sources" all good researchers do, why not you?

Q#10 - Ms Bruni, On Page 71, You state that "Busty Bustinza" cannot recall the names of the men he picked up that night, (3rd UFO Incident) I ask again, have you read his previous interviews by Larry Faucett, Ray Bouche, Chuck Decaro, etc. If so, then why did you not question the man, because he knew whom he had picked up in 1984 when he was first interviewed, What is your agenda?

Q#11 - Ms Bruni, Did you tell researcher, Brenda Butler that Larry Warren and Peter Robbins "made up" the other witness supportive statements in "Left At East Gate", and that we made up the supportive statements from witnesses that came after our books publication.

Ref: P. Robbins lecture at Leeds 1998

Ref: Info that was offered to you by me and Peter that you had no interest in?

Brenda said this to more than just myself.

Q#12 - Ms Bruni, On page 72 of your book, you write "Larry Warren claims to have seen three aeronaut entities communicating with Gordon Williams." Please show me where in the last 20 years - That I have used the term "Aeronaut" to describe the phenomena we observed, I mean you say that I "claim" that. What is your source?

On communication with Williams, I’ve never once said that definite communication took place with Williams, I say it could have - Please explain yourself?

Your book clearly places Williams on site, but with so many agendas going on at once, you might have missed it?

Q#13 - Ms Bruni, Why do you write that I saw a "huge machine land"? I’ve never said that, and it wasn't "huge", I also never saw the machine land! So what is your purpose for attributing that description to me as if you are quoting me?

Again, I ask did you really read "Left At East Gate"?

Q#14 - Ms Bruni, Have you watched the 3 part CNN broadcast from 1985? If so, why did you mention it only in passing in your book, and on top of this describe it inaccurately. Example, "Capt Mike Verrano doesn't just "claim" to have driven Williams to a jet with film of the UFO," He did!

You also write that Larry Warren was "surprised to recognise Verrano on the show," How do you conclude this? I worked with Chuck Decaro from beginning to end on that program and had spoken to most of the participants before it was broadcast in February 1985. Why the surprise? I was the first person interviewed by CNN in September 1984 as well.

Q#15 - Ms Bruni, On page 74 you write that I was "upset" and "paranoid" after the UFO incident and that Bustinza tried to "calm me down." You also write that Bustinza remembers walking down the hall while I wonder if cameras where watching us? In reality, Bustinza asked to talk to me! Why did he not paint me as a paranoid in 1984, your information is false.

You also state that Larry Warren was talking to "everyone about the UFO", again, not true! Cookie (Belinda) Vaughn was my girlfriend at that time, as you know, from speaking to her yourself! I never told her about it! You have your facts ass backwards again! And you seem to be hell-bent to create an untrue picture of me. Please explain your research methods of this issue? Check out Cookie’s recollection's from that time on your own website, or have you removed it? Because it’s another contradiction? Let me add, that Cookie was not a security police woman.

Q#16 - Ms Bruni, After two letters and verbal requests for you to return my photographs and documents, you finally did, via your "man servant" Nick pope, at last Septembers Leeds Conference. Thank you, however you seem to have forgotten to enclose that yellow piece paper from Bustinza’s girlfriend, Cindy Schultz, telling me that Busty wanted to talk!

You must remember that one? It had text from Bentwaters all-ranks club on the reverse and a picture of a mule. As you know, that is the actual note that Busty had slipped under my door that initiated our first discussions about our experiences. You can read the true version in "Left At East Gate" if you like. I do have a copy of the note, I sent you the original (Silly Me) and it kind of blows your version of events out of the water that I refer to in question 15. You know you have it, why did you not explore, "if indeed he was accurately quoted by you" this fact with Bustinza.

Please explain, and please return the note, sweetie, ta!

Q#17 - Ms Bruni, on page 73 of your book, you write that "I was convinced Gordon Williams communicated with the crew of an "Alien Spaceship"" Again on page 73, you state that "No one else puts Williams at the landing sites" You naughty girl!!!

On the first point, (Again) I’ve never in 20 years described the phenomena we saw as one "Alien" nor have I ever described the machine we saw on Capel Green, as a "Spaceship"! (I mean, how would I know?) If you had read "Left At East Gate" you would have noticed that I do not believe the object came from "Space" at all. I believe it was from the future! I also expressed this opinion to you on the phone as well (Check your "research tapes") on the first point again, I never said that "definite" communication with the "crew" (Another description I’ve never ever used!) Took place with Williams, I say, Some form of communication could have taken place, with Williams. Once again, please describe your research methods on these points, if any were used?

As for others placing Williams on site, you write that "no one else does!" Halt has, the interviews with participants conducted by Ray Bouche confirms that "fact" as well, and was published in a MUFON journal and "Left At East Gate!" Your book goes to great lengths to remove Williams from the incident, however your writing, and the mans own actions and words indite him as having been involved.

P.S. He was!

This is a bit more complex then the previous questions, but do give it the old college try. I will simplify it, why did you ignore established facts? (And Please, No Spin!)

Q#18 - Ms Bruni, In your book you claim the following (false) information.

Larry Warren was never cleared to work in the WSA "Did you really and truly read my book?"

Did you review my existing military records, (published in the appendix) or did we make these records up as well?

Had you done so, you knew before you published your book, that on 11th Dec ‘80, I was posted to D flight with my security clearance (intact), on the 15th Dec ‘80, I received my (PRP) which is clearance to work with nuclear weapons, (in the WSA). I did so twice before the UFO incident. I believe that you knew that too!

Lady, from where I stand, I don’t see a hint of "investigative journalism" skills on your part! Please explain why you make blanket statements that are clearly false.

Q#19 - Ms Bruni, On page 77 in your book you tell the "hopefully" true account of a Bruce Tyler, whom describes a similar film to the one we were shown within hours of the UFO incident! You then write that this film was, quote "probably the exact same film that Larry and the other witnesses were shown" end quote.

Perhaps it was? Big deal, why in one sentence do you back up events that did happen to me and in the next write falsehoods and slander about me. That is a tactic you seem to use throughout your book, why?

Q#20 - Ms Bruni, In a recent issue of UFO Magazine (UK) you know, the one with your interview and the masked howls of hate, i.e. Pain you direct at me. Well in that issue, it was announced that we had sold the option for a film treatment of "Left At East Gate", this may or may not pan out, but that's showbiz right! (Although things do look good folks)

Ms Bruni you claim to have extensive background in public relations (I do) and are now an author right, so please explain your reasons for contacting "Fast Carrier Pictures" President Steve Rubin, (The man who bought the film option on Left At East Gate) (Smart Guy!) And then trying to flog your book to him, (as if the company would drop us) First I suggest that you get your own dramatic literary agent, (you need one, as the movie business does not accept unsolicited material.) As a PR you should have known this!

Lastly, stay the hell off my coat tails and be original for once. What is your version of this "fact", because your actions seem rather sleazy, but wait, I would expect that from a gossip writer.

Q#21 - A bonus question, should you be up for it? (I can’t resist)

Ms Bruni, In your book you refer to a conversation with researcher Brenda Butler, you write that at some point Brenda offered me false information (Perhaps back in 1983?) "And he (Me) took the bait!" A load of old shit girlfriend. But worse you write that you ask me about the aforementioned crap and then attribute a false quote, by me in response as if I am a stuttering idiot!

Look, you know, that I know, that you know, I never said what you wrote, and further, the inflection and style of speech is not mine. Perhaps yours? If you have it on tape, produce it!

Brenda tells me that you misquoted her? So either you or she speaks with forked tongue?

Well sweetie, if you do well with these I have another 385 for you!

Of those we can discuss the "pictures"and many other "fun facts"

To all that have read this,

I’m not the sort that likes to put people on the spot, nor do I like to be perceived as a bully.

Ms. Bruni has chosen to include information in her book that she knows is false, she also spun statements about me to fit her agenda, never in 20 years has anyone done this, (Not even the debunkers!) I wanted to take legal action but reminded myself that the many thousands of intelligent people the world over, who have read my book, will find the problems that I have with Ms. Bruni’s book to be self evident. Read her book by all means, but you won’t find anything to be "Definitive" or with regard to Larry Warren, "True" at all.

I hope she answers these questions, as I’m a major focus of her Warren Commission style take on the Bentwaters case.

Should she choose not too, that will be self evident as well. It’s a lousy position to be in. As I’ve fought hard for twenty years to get this case into the wider public eye and she has put great effort in confusing it rather then resolving it.

You be the judge!

A lengthy overview of her book is on the way, and many "issues and facts" in Bruni’s book need to be addressed.

Larry Warren

P.S. If Ms Bruni has nothing to hide, I’d rather debate these issues in a public forum, she can even have Nick Pope on stage with her for moral support!

Larry asked, having read her book, does this e-mail dated from when her manuscript was in the can, make sense to any of you or do you smell agenda?

X-Sender: georgina@*****
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tues, 29 Sept 1998 01:52:50 +100
To: Peter Robbins <****@*****
From: georgina@*****
Subject Re: HOT GOSSIP UK - SEPT

Hi Peter

Sorry for the delay. It’ that time of month again - uploading the magazine

Good news!!!!! I got the book deal with a nice advance too. It’s being published by Sidgwick & Jackson - Macmillan. Signing next week.

You are one of the first to know.

Nick says he and Bridgette had a great time in NY.

I’d be honoured to be mentioned on your site Peter and I’ll russle up a brief thingie. How many words do you want?

Thanks for answering those questions. Hope Larry is well. Please tell him about my book deal and the fact that my research has uncovered enough to completely confirm that he was there. It’s not looking good for Halt though.

Hugs

Georgina

© Copyright Larry Warren

11.03.01

Below are links to other interesting facts about the Rendlesham mystery including exclusive emails
from Larry Warren (Left At East Gate) and a reply from Georgina Bruni (You Can't Tell The People)

All pictures, drawings and witness statements are copyrighted.
if you want to use any of this material you should contact us at:

Hull UFO Society

Click the links below read up on the new events of Rendlesham.........

Larry Warren Speaks Out

Georgina Bruni's Reply

Emails About Larry Warren Vs Georgina Bruni

Rendlescam!!!

Right Back At East Gate

To download some of the latest offical Rendlesham & UFO Files, click the link below........



If you have an opinion about Rendlesham, Email Us Here